Legal Opinion

Hart v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1894PublishedCited by 23 opinions

On demurrer to declaration,

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Magie, J.

The declaration in this case contains two-counts, and each of the defendants has separately demurred.

The question presented by the demurrer of the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Union will be first considered.

The first count charges that, on September 26th, 1890, a public highway in Union county was under the control of said board, having been acquired by it under the “Act to-enable boards of chosen freeholders to acquire, improve and maintain public roads” (Pamph. L. 1889, p. 58), and that thereby it became the duty of said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waters v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Ramirez v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hammond v. County of MonmouthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. Oklahoma City v. TyteniczSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Natrona County v. BlakeWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API