Legal Opinion

Blume v. Bohanna

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1951No. 31522PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

— Plaintiff brought this action' to compel specific performance of the renewal-option provision of a lease. The facts material to the controversy were stated in a stipulation entered into by the parties which was admitted in evidence at the trial. After considering this stipulation and the arguments presented on behalf of the plaintiff and defendants, the trial court took the case under advisement and subsequently entered a decree of specific performance directing the defendant Bohanna to execute a certain lease and deliver it to the plaintiff. From this decree the defendants have appealed.

Eva…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Frye & BruhnWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Murray v. OdmanWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Seattle v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Diettrich v. J. J. Newberry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Pulsifer v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wessells v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Family Medical Building, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Stevenson v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Finch v. King Solomon Lodge No. 60Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Sales v. ColeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API