Legal Opinion
Murray v. Odman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1939No. 27502PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to compel specific performance of the extension provision of a lease and to have the court determine the rental value of the premises during the additive portion of the term. The court decreed specific performance and fixed the amount of rental for the sequent period. Defendants have appealed.
On July 19, 1933, Amy White leased, for a term of years, to Fred R. Sparger and W. L. Wood, copartners, an unimproved tract of land, described by lot and block number, in the city of Seattle. As consideration for the lease, the lessees covenanted to pay a rental of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nat. Bank of Commerce of Seattle v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Toellner v. McGinnisWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Diettrich v. J. J. Newberry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- Gates v. Hutchinson Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Salzer v. ManfrediWashington Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Family Medical Building, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Womble v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Labor Hall Ass'n, Inc. v. DanielsenWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Pier 67, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Anderson v. FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.