Legal Opinion

Rhinelander v. Rhinelander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 4, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In affirming the judgment in this case, we think our views should be stated with reference to the alleged error in the charge of the trial court concerning the failure of the defendant to take the stand and deny certain statements which plaintiff testified the defendant had made to him to the effect that she was not of colored blood.

Appellant’s contention upon this point is that, as the defendant was in court throughout the trial, and capable of testifying and did not testify, the evidence of the plaintiff as to personal transactions with her and statements made by her should have been taken…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wylde v. Northern Railroad Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. In re SimonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. FeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of RhinelanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. Dupper v. RoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Kenwell v. LeeNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Nelson v. RumseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API