Legal Opinion
SWIFT v. PANDEY
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 2, 2022No. 2:13-cv-00650Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ROBERT SWIFT, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:13-cv-00650 (BRM) (JSA) v. OPINION RAMESH PANDEY, et al., Defendants. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Robert Swift’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (ECF No. 426.) Defendants Ramesh Pandey (“R. Pandey”) and Bhuwan Pandey (“B. Pandey,” and together with R. Pandey, “Defendants”) opposed the motion and filed a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 434.) Plaintiff filed a response to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jiminez Ex Rel. Estate of Serrano v. All American Rathskeller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Weichert Co. Realtors v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.