Legal Opinion

Dopita v. SM Fencing & Energy Services

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided December 13, 2018No. 1:18-cv-00223Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Cameron Dopita, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ) STRIKE vs. ) ) SM Fencing & Energy Services, ) ) Case No. 1:18-cv-223 ) Defendants. ) Before the court is a “Motion to Strike Punitive Damages from Plaintiff’s Complaint” filed by defendant on December 4, 2018. (Doc. No. 11). Plaintiff filed a complaint that contains a request for punitive damages. (Doc. No. 1). Defendant seeks to strike this request pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 32-03.2-11. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) empowers the court to “strike from the pleading an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Professional Asset Management, Inc. v. Penn Square Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Barnes Foundation v. Township of Lower MerionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried EmployeesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API