Legal Opinion

Professional Asset Management, Inc. v. Penn Square Bank, N.A.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 2, 1983No. CIV-82-1357-WPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEE R. WEST, District Judge.

In addition to its Federal Rule 12(b)(6) challenge to the sufficiency of the complaint, which is addressed in a separate order of this court, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation [hereinafter “FDIC”] as receiver of the Penn Square Bank has moved to strike the plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages as to it under Federal Rule 12(f). The plaintiff has responded, both to the FDIC’s initial motion, going to the original complaint, and its supplemental motion, going to the first amended complaint. For the reasons discussed below, the FDIC’s motion is granted.

Th…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Landy v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Morriss v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Oller v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Sheik v. HobsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Olney Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Trinity Banc Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. Balabanos v. North American Investment Group, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  4. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
  5. Tuxedo Beach Club Corp. v. City Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API