Legal Opinion

Paradigm Contract Management Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 6, 2009No. SC 18301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

This case presents the narrow issue of whether any claim that may be asserted against a labor and material payment bond required by General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 49-41 1 must be asserted within the time limit provided in General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 49-42 (b). 2 The plaintiff, Paradigm Contract Man agement Company, brought this action against the defendant, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, seeking to enforce, pursuant to § 49-41, a labor and material payment bond that the defendant had executed in connection with a municipal construction project. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Thomas v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. American Masons' Supply Co. v. F. W. Brown Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Hayes v. BeresfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tayco Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Blakely v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API