Paradigm Contract Management Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
This case presents the narrow issue of whether any claim that may be asserted against a labor and material payment bond required by General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 49-41 1 must be asserted within the time limit provided in General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 49-42 (b). 2 The plaintiff, Paradigm Contract Man agement Company, brought this action against the defendant, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, seeking to enforce, pursuant to § 49-41, a labor and material payment bond that the defendant had executed in connection with a municipal construction project. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Thomas v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- American Masons' Supply Co. v. F. W. Brown Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Hayes v. BeresfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tayco Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Blakely v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016