United States v. Floyd Stroh, United States of America v. Bruce Vollmer
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
Floyd Stroh and Bruce Vollmer challenge the sufficiency of the evidence supporting their jury convictions for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, money laundering, conspiracy to launder money, and distribution of a controlled substance. We affirm.
I
Stroh and Vollmer were acquaintances in the Bismarck, North Dakota area. At trial, the jury found that Stroh and Vollmer had participated in a drug distribution and money laundering conspiracy whereby they purchased drugs in California, sent the drugs to North Dakota for resale, and received the profits via wire…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Ronald D. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Llewellyn Joseph Ireland, Also Known as Bucky Ireland, United States of America v. Tina Renee Desormeaux IrelandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. George T. Wilcox, Also Known as Tommy Wilcox, United States of America v. Roger Counts, Also Known as Tex CountsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Lee Hood, Also Known as Henry Leon HoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Daniel Lewis Lee, Also Known as Daniel Lewis Graham, Also Known as D L Graham, Also Known as Danny LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Benjamin Godfrey Chipps, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Keith Maynie, Jr., United States of America v. Dietrick Lavon Banks, United States of America v. Lenora LoganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Duane Carl CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Shelbourne SelwynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.