Legal Opinion
Purcell v. Riebe
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 16, 1910No. Appeal, No. 364PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Jan. T., 1906, No. 138, on verdict for defendant by direction of the court in case of Michael Purcell and Margaret Purcell v. Herman Riebe. Trespass for damages for personal injuries. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Error assigned was in directing verdict for defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
March 21, 1910:
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge before whom the case was tried.
2Cited by12 opinions
- German v. McKeesport City (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Davis v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Goodwyn v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- McManamon v. Hanover TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Levitt v. B/G Sandwich Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.