Legal Opinion

McManamon v. Hanover Township

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 6, 1911No. Appeal, No. 31PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal, No. 31, Jan. T., 1911, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1908, No. 293, on verdict for defendant by direction in case of Mary McManamon v. Township of Hanover. Trespass to recover damages for death. Before Ferris, J. • The facts appear in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The court directed a verdict for the defendant and judgment thereon. Plaintiff appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 31, Jan. T., 1911, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1908, No. 293, on verdict for defendant by direction in case of Mary McManamon v. Township of Hanover. Trespass to recover damages for death. Before Ferris, J. • The facts appear in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The court directed a verdict for the defendant and judgment thereon. Plaintiff appealed. Errors assigned were in directing a verdict for the defendant. — Under the evidence it was properly for the jury to say whether the defendant was guilty of negligence in maintaining in the highway the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moschziskeb,

On February 1, 1908, at about 9:30 o’clock in the' evening Patrick McManamon was killed. His widow brought an action on behalf of herself and the children of the deceased to recover damages for the loss of his life, claiming that his death was due to the negligence of the defendant township. The court below gave binding instructions for defendant, judgment was entered accordingly, and the plaintiff has appealed. The sole question is, Was there sufficient evidence to justify the submission to the jury of the issues as to the negligence of the defendant and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Allen v. WillardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Steck v. City of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Bradwell v. Pittsb. Etc. Pass. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Coolbroth v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Musselman v. Hatfield BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Flucker v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Dattola Et Ux. v. Burt Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. King v. Darlington Brick & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Dannals v. Sylvania TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Glancy v. McKees Rocks BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API