Legal Opinion

Winebow, Inc. v. Capitol-Husting Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 16, 2017No. 16-3682PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Eighteen years ago, Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson vetoed portions of an appropriations bill that imposed new regulations on alcohol dealers and distributors. In doing so, the governor hoped to diminish the regulatory burden on wine dealerships. In the present case, which pits an upstream wine business against two whole sale wine distributors, the question is whether Governor Thompson achieved that goal. The answer turns on the proper understanding of state law. Because there is no guiding precedent and the issue is of great practical importance, we respectfully certify…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Moses Boyd, Jr. v. Illinois State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Ziegler Co., Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Landis v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Senate v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daphne Smith v. RecordQuest LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  2. Winebow, Inc. v. Capitol-Husting Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Close Armstrong, LLC v. Trunkline Gas Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026
  4. Colborn v. Netflix IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
  5. Grose v. City of MilwaukeeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API