Legal Opinion

Winebow, Inc. v. Capitol-Husting Co., Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2018No. 2017AP001595-CQPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

*734¶ 1 This case is before the court on a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Winebow, Inc. v. Capitol-Husting Co., Inc., 867 F.3d 862 (7th Cir. 2017) ; see Wis. Stat. § 821.01 (2015-16).1 It certified the following question: "Does the definition of a dealership contained in Wis. Stat. § 135.02(3)(b) include wine grantor-dealer relationships?" Winebow, 867 F.3d at 871.

¶ 2 Our answer to this certified question will aid the Seventh Circuit in determining whether Winebow, Inc.'s (Winebow) attempt to end its business relationship with *633two wine…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ziegler Co., Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Milwaukee County v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Daphne Smith v. RecordQuest LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  2. Chris Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  3. St. Augustine School v. Carolyn Stanford TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  4. WSBU v. Joel BrennanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Town of Wilson v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API