In re Daniels
District Court, D. Rhode Island
In Bankruptcy. On review of referee’s decision.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The claim of Congdon & Carpenter Company, which the referee has disallowed as a claim having priority in the settlement of the individual estate of George F. Daniels, bankrupt, is for costs incurred in a suit against Daniels and one Slocum as co-partners, under the firm style of the Providence Spring Bed Company. Neither the partnership nor the other partner has been adjudged a bankrupt.
In support of the referee’s ruling, the trustee contends that there is no provision in the bankruptcy law whereby costs incurred by a creditor in an action to recover a debt prior to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Derby v. Worcester CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- In re WilcoxDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1899
- In re LewisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1900
- In re AllenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1899
- In re Beaver Coal. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re BennettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
- In re JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1907
- In re Iroquois Mach. Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1909
- In re AmoratisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
- In re Copper King, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.