Legal Opinion

Derby v. Worcester County

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 20, 1900No. Nos. 308, 312, 318PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

The underlying questions involved in these three cases are the right of the county of Worcester to prove a claim in bankruptcy, and to have priority for the claim if allowed, all under the bankruptcy act of July 1, 1898, c. 541 (30 Stat. 544). The referee allowed the claim, but refused it priority. On appeal to the district court, that court, on the 21st day of July, 1899, entered an order as follows: “It is hereby ordered and decreed that the debt may *810be proved by the county and is entitled to priority, and that the decree of the referee be modified accordingly.” Derby,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Thompson v. Saint Nicholas National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. The KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Kingman v. Western Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Central Trust Co. v. Grant Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Mayflower Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Fisher v. CushmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
  3. Dodge v. NorlinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. Courtney v. Fidelity Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  5. Chesapeake Shoe Co. v. SeldnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1903

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API