Legal Opinion

In re Amoratis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1910No. 1,778PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Petition for Revision of Order of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. In the matter of James Amoratis, bankrupt. On petition to revise order denying priority to claim of Rauer’s Raw & Collection Company.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition for revision under Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, §• 24b, 30 Stat. 553 (U. S. Comp. St. 190.1, p. 3432), of an order of the District Court of the Northern District of California, affirming an order made by the referee in the matter of disallowing the right of priority of payment to the present petitioner of costs incurred in an attachment suit brought by it against the bankrupt, all of which costs were expended prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy. Prior to the filing of that petition the present petitioner filed a suit in the superior…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holden v. StrattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Derby v. Worcester CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
  3. In re DanielsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1901
  4. In re Iroquois Mach. Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1909
  5. In re GoldbergDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re NicholsonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API