Legal Opinion
McCuiston v. Hoffa
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 14, 2004No. CIV. 04-70047PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are residents of Michigan and members of local unions in Michigan. They filed suit against defendants Hoffa (a resident of southeast Michigan), Conder (a resident of Kansas City, Missouri), and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT), which has its principal office in Washington D.C.. The complaint had three counts: (1) a violation of equal voting rights in violation of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. § 411(a)(1); (2) breach of the IBT constitution in violation of the Labor Management Relations…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kelly Services v. EidnesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Fluidtech, Inc. v. Gemu Valves, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Whitaker v. StampingDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- McCuiston v. HoffaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Brown v. PSCU, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020