Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Stamping

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 5, 2014No. 2:13-cv-14210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [# 8] AND CANCELLING HEARING

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss [# 8] filed by the Defendant, Hatch Stamping (“Defendant”). The matter is fully briefed and the Court finds that oral argument will not aid in the resolution of this matter. Accordingly, the Court will resolve the present motion on the briefs submitted. See E.D.Mich. LR 7.1(f)(2) (“The court will hold a hearing on all other motions unless the [court] orders submission and determination without hearing.”). For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laura Clark as Personal Representative of the Estate of Christopher Tylie Jackson-Clark v. Richard Baker, M.D., Mary Beerworth, M.D.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  2. Beyoglides v. Montgomery County SheriffDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
  3. Rayfield v. Grand Rapids, City ofDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API