Legal Opinion
Fluidtech, Inc. v. Gemu Valves, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 23, 2006No. 06-CV-12731PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE AND TRANSFERRING THIS ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
CLELAND, District Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendant Gemo Valves, Inc.’s “Motion for Transfer of Venue.” This motion has been fully briefed and the court concludes that a hearing on the motion is not necessary. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2). For the reasons stated below, the court will grant Defendant’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is a Michigan corporation with its principal place of business in Wayne County, Michigan and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- EBI-Detroit, Inc. v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Hige v. Turbonetics Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Brown v. PSCU, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Garcia v. FCA US, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Garcia v. FCA US, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.