Harding Glass Co. v. Twin City Pipe Line Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
The Twin City Pipe Line Company brought suit to compel the Harding Glass Company to perform a contract, and obtained a decree. The glass company has appealed.. *409The principal question involved is whether the contract is so illegal that the court will not aid in its enforcement. The glass company has a factory at Ft. Smith, Ark., and uses a large amount of gas in the manufacture of its products. The pipe line company is a public utility corporation which supplies gas from natural gas fields to Ft. Smith, where it sells the gas to industries, and to a company which…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. E. C. Knight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1990
- Tampa Electric Company v. Nashville Coal Company, Nashville Coal, Inc., and West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Tampa Electric Company v. Nashville Coal Company, Nashville Coal, Inc., and West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960