Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tampa Electric Company v. Nashville Coal Company, Nashville Coal, Inc., and West Kentucky Coal Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1960No. 13775Published

1DissentWeick, Circuit Judge

It is with reluctance that I have filed this dissenting opinion, particularly in view of the careful consideration which this case has received by the majority and by the District Judge: With deference to my colleagues, whose views I respect, I am of the opinion that the authorities on which they relied, when applied to the facts of this case, do not compel the decision which they reached. I think the judgment below has produced a harsh result, not in the contemplation of the Clayton Act, which is being enforced against the wrong party.

The seller1 has successfully avoided its contractual…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API