Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rosenthal

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 3, 2001No. 99-P-689PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.

Following a jury-waived trial, a judge of the Superior Court found the defendant guilty of possession of a class B substance with intent to distribute. G. L. c. 94C, § 32A(a).1 The defendant appeals, claiming error in the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress cocaine found on his person. *708We reverse the judgment because we agree that the evidence was obtained during the course of a search initiated on the pretext that it was an administrative inspection, when the sole object of the investigation was to uncover evidence of illegality and there were no other circumstances justifying the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. StouteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. BorgesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MuckleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  2. Muldoon v. LaChance Financial Services, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. CornielMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. HayesMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API