Legal Opinion

Trousdale v. Henry

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided June 24, 2008No. 14-06-00848-CVPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

WANDA McKEE FOWLER, Justice.

Lenieta Wylene Trousdale (“Trousdale”) appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appel-lees, Annette M. Henry, R. Christopher Bell, and Bell & Henry, L.L.P. In three issues, Trousdale contends the trial court erred in its grant of summary judgment and its dismissal of her claims with prejudice, because (1) certain of appellees’ actions constitute a breach of fiduciary duty, to which a four-year statute of limitations applies; (2) the non-fracturing rule does not apply to the facts of this case, as claims for breach…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Seureau v. ExxonMobil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. Holland v. Lovelace, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  3. Vanderbilt Mtge and Fin, Inc. v. Cesar Flores, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. Levels v. MerlinoDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
  5. In Re Helena Chemical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API