Legal Opinion
Moreland v. Gold Kist, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided December 20, 1995No. 2:95-cv-02587PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PROPST, District Judge.
This cause comes on to be heard on Plaintiff’s Motion To Remand filed on November 13,1995. Plaintiffs motion is premised on 28 U.S.C. § 1445(c) which states: “A civil action in State court arising under the workmen’s compensation laws of such State may not be removed to any district court of the United States.” 1
Plaintiffs claim is that she was the victim of a retaliatory discharge as forbidden by § 25-5-11.1, Code of Alabama. That section provides:
No employee shall be terminated by an employer solely because the employee has instituted or maintained…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- William Jones v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Walter Spearman v. Exxon Coal Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- New v. Sports & Recreation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Roberts v. Beaulieu of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
- Farrior v. Sodexho, U.S.A.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
- Lackey v. Gateway Homes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
- Reed v. Heil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.