Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc. (“Laidlaw”), owns and operates a hazardous waste incinerator in Roebuck, South Carolina. As part of that facility, Laidlaw maintains a wastewater treatment plant for water used in the incineration process. Laidlaw discharges the treated wastewater into the North Tyger River pursuant to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit issued by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”).
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Switzerland Cheese Assn., Inc. v. E. Horne's Market, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Friends of Milwaukee's Rivers and Lake Michigan Federation v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Williams Pipe Line Co. v. Bayer Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1997
- Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. v. Maple Coal Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.