Legal Opinion

Van Tine v. Idaho State Insurance Fund

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1994No. 20623PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an insurance bad faith ease against the State Insurance Fund (SIF) arising out of a workers’ compensation claim. We conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to decide whether SIF is liable to the claimant for alleged breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing and for alleged breach of fiduciary duty. We also conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider whether SIF has waived its subrogation right provided for under the workers’ compensation law.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.

Kerby Van Tine (Van…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Royce v. Southwest Pipe of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Archer v. Bonners Ferry DatsunIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Smith v. O/P Transportation, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Meisner v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Downey Chiropractic Clinic v. Nampa Restaurant Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Van TineIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Owsley v. Idaho Industrial Com'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Williams v. Blue Cross of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API