Legal Opinion

Cuba Distilling Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 26, 1944No. 382PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Whatever measure of lenity we should accord the “Lara”, faced with the sudden apparition of the “Cassimir,” we cannot excuse her altogether. The judge found that, when the “Cassimir’s” lights were snapped on, she already appeared to be a vessel headed across the “Lara’s” bows from port to starboard. That finding had adequate support in the evidence, and we will not disturb it. It made the “Lara’s” navigation the only course sure to bring her into collision. Had she kept on, she would probably have gone under the “Cassimir’s” stern; had she backed, she would almost certainly have done so; had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. H. Bull S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pacific-Atlantic S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Union Oil Company of California v. The Tug Mary Malloy, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. S.S. Soya AtlanticDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  4. United States of America and Alexander H. Hood v. M/v Wuerttemberg, and Partenteederei WuerttembergCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  5. Bultema Dock & Dredge Co. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API