Legal Opinion

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports

Decided March 14, 1986No. 85-605Published

1Opinion of the Court

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP Attorney General _________________________ : OPINION : No. 85-605 : of : MARCH 14, 1986 : JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP : Attorney General : : RONALD M. WEISKOPF : Deputy Attorney General : : ________________________________________________________________________ THE HONORABLE JOHN W. WITT, CITY PROSECUTOR, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, has requested an opinion on the following question: Is a dentist authorized to utilize the following in the course of the practice of dentistry: (1) urinalysis; (2)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Franz v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Gore v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Contreras v. St. Luke's HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Jacobs v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API