Legal Opinion

Ronalco, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Justice.

The issue before the court is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment for respondent, Home Insurance Company, holding that an exclusionary clause in a contract of insurance is applicable to relieve respondent of liability.

Movant, Ronalco, Inc., contracted with International Harvester to replace the innermost lining of a furnace. The old lining was to be removed by use of small dynamite charges. Prior to beginning the job, Ronalco purchased a special dynamiting endorsement to its liability policy from Home Insurance. While the work was being done, a dynamite…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hendrix Elec. Co., Inc. v. Casualty Reciprocal Exch.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. International Derrick & Equipment Co. v. BuxbaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  4. Insurance Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Madden v. Vitamilk Dairy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West American Insurance v. PrewittDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2005
  2. Dr. Manav Das v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin, et al.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
  3. Erie Insurance Company v. WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API