Legal Opinion

Madden v. Vitamilk Dairy, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1961No. 35672PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver,

A pre-trial order limited the issue determined by the trial court-to the question:

“Was the tanker truck in question under the care, custody or control of the plaintiff or the defendant at the time of the incident here involved.”

Plaintiff, a common carrier, was licensed to deliver milk from farms to dairies. He used a milk tanker truck consisting of a tractor and a semi-trailer.

October 16,1957, plaintiff’s driver parked the tanker truck in the unloading area of defendant dairy. By reason of defendant employee’s negligence in pumping the milk from the truck, a vacuum was created in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rex Roofing Co. v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Edwards v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  3. A. T. Morris & Co. v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HolmsgaardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HopperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. PFZ Properties, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
  2. Phil Schroeder, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Olds-Olympic, Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Olds-Olympic, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. American Family Mut. Ins. Company v. BentleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API