Harris v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge
This appeal requires the Court to construe section 47-3-110 of the South Carolina Code (1987), the so-called dog bite statute. The narrow question before us is the meaning of the term “or” in section 47-3-110. The broader question requires us to discern the degree, if any, to which the Legislature retained the application of common law principles in section 47-3-110.
In construing the term “or” consistent with its common understanding as a disjunctive, we hold section 47-3-110 allows a plaintiff to pursue a statutory claim against the owner of the dog “or other person having the dog in his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- State Ex Rel. McLeod v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Hossenlopp Ex Rel. Hossenlopp v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Transportation Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Lorbacher v. Housing Authority of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Cabiness v. Town of James IslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. ChristmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.