Legal Opinion

Harris v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 9, 2009No. 26596PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge

This appeal requires the Court to construe section 47-3-110 of the South Carolina Code (1987), the so-called dog bite statute. The narrow question before us is the meaning of the term “or” in section 47-3-110. The broader question requires us to discern the degree, if any, to which the Legislature retained the application of common law principles in section 47-3-110.

In construing the term “or” consistent with its common understanding as a disjunctive, we hold section 47-3-110 allows a plaintiff to pursue a statutory claim against the owner of the dog “or other person having the dog in his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  5. Hossenlopp Ex Rel. Hossenlopp v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Transportation Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Lorbacher v. Housing Authority of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Cabiness v. Town of James IslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. ChristmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API