Legal Opinion

Hossenlopp Ex Rel. Hossenlopp v. Cannon

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 26, 1985No. 22303PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff-respondent, Eric John Hossenlopp, a four-year old child, bring this action to recover for injuries sustained when the dog of defendant-appellants, William J. Cannon, Jr. and Yong H. Cannon, attacked him causing personal injuries of nineteen puncture wounds requiring sutures, sur*369gery and hospitalization. It is a tort action alleging negligence on the part of the owners in 1) keeping a dangerous animal with knowledge it had dangerous propensities; 2) allowing the dog to run at large in violation of statutory law; and 3) in failing to restrain the animal.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McQuaig Ex Rel. McQuaig v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  2. Giles v. RussellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  3. Conoley v. RielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Whiteside v. Cherokee County School District No. OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Ravan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Russo v. SuttonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Vaught v. WaitesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API