Legal Opinion
Spurlock v. Satterfield
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1999No. 97-6076PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant, Danny Satterfield, a Deputy with the Sumner County Sheriffs Department (“S.C.S.D.”), appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss based on absolute or qualified immunity. Plaintiffs-Appellees, Robert Spurlock and Ronnie Marshall, alleged that Satterfield committed various acts that violated their constitutional and/or statutory rights. For the reasons stated herein, we find that Sat-terfield is not entitled to either absolute or qualified immunity for these alleged actions, and affirm the district court’s decision.
I
On…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Gregory v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Tyron Brown v. Lee LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Lucinda Darrah v. City of Oak Park, Russell Bragg, a Troy Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Castellano v. FragozoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.