Legal Opinion
Ragan v. Cox
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 23, 1962No. 634, MiscPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
In accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The order of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings. Simcox v. Madigan, 366 U. S. 765.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Simcox v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
3Cited by30 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mister Ralpho v. J. Raymond Bell, Chairman, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- J. D. Bradley v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.