United States v. Hightower
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
The accused was convicted of perjury and subornation of perjury. We granted his petition for review to consider the validity of the post-trial review by the Staff Judge Advocate.
Early in 1953, the accused and one Borden were tried by a special court-martial for attempted larceny of gasoline. At the trial, the accused testified that he had béen authorized by an Airman Moye to siphon some gasoline *387from his 1939 Ford automobile. Moye told him where the car was parked. Arriving at the place, he found an automobile of like manufacture. He inserted a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. CoulterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ClissonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. SchullerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. CrunkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. MasseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. HurtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. AlbrightUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. ErbUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- United States v. McClennyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.