Legal Opinion

United States v. Hightower

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 7, 1955No. 4879PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused was convicted of perjury and subornation of perjury. We granted his petition for review to consider the validity of the post-trial review by the Staff Judge Advocate.

Early in 1953, the accused and one Borden were tried by a special court-martial for attempted larceny of gasoline. At the trial, the accused testified that he had béen authorized by an Airman Moye to siphon some gasoline *387from his 1939 Ford automobile. Moye told him where the car was parked. Arriving at the place, he found an automobile of like manufacture. He inserted a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. CoulterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. ClissonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. SchullerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. CrunkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. MasseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. HurtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. AlbrightUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. ErbUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  5. United States v. McClennyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API