Legal Opinion

Danich v. Culjak

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1937No. 26412. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

During the month of October, 1934, Joe and Maria Bouche, the lessees named in a lease from the state of Washington covering certain land in King county supposed to contain coal, executed a sublease of the land to plaintiff, Vic Danich, and defendants, Dave Culjak, Stanley Simich, and Steve Pukich. During the month of February, 1935, these four sublessees entered into a written partnership agreement providing for the development of the property, each contributing five hundred dollars toward a capital fund with which to conduct mining operations.

The partnership agreement provided that a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Salhinger v. SalhingerWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Kittilsby v. VevelstadWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holman v. CoieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Bank v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hatupin v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Curley Elec., Inc. v. BillsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Curley Electric, Inc. v. BillsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API