Legal Opinion

City of Malvern v. Young

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 1943No. 4-7065PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoFaddin, J.

This appeal involves the ownership of funds of a municipal improvement district, and also involves the validity of a municipal ordinance fixing’ water rates.

Appellee, as a property óAvner of Waterworks District No. 12 of Malvern, Arkansas, sought to enjoin the Commissioners of said district (defendants below and appellants here) from transferring $4,909.38 to the City of Malvern. Also appellee, as a property owner and resident of WaterAvorks District No. 14 of Malvern, sought to enjoin the enforcement of ordinance No. 371 of that city, which ordinance fixed water rates. On this latter phase…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Snodgrass v. PocahontasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  2. Freeman v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  3. Town of Augusta v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Arkansas Light & Power Co. v. ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Williams v. Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Faxe v. City of GrandviewWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Kliks v. Dalles CityOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Campbell v. City of Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Douthit v. Ark. Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Slinkard v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API