Legal Opinion

Town of Augusta v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 15, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Woodruff Chancery Court; Edward D. Robertson, Chancellor; 1. The ordinance was void, and the ratification gave it no validity. Dillon on Mun. Corp., § § 1301, 791-2; Pond on Pub. Utilities, § § 354-5, 348, 361-2; 16 Utah, 440; 160 Ind. 32; 7 S. D. 9; 71 Ark. 4; 86 Id. 1; 94 Id. 380; 109 Id. 90; 90 Id. 380; 93 Id. 490; 86 Id. 1; 71 Id. 4. ■ 2. There is no estoppel. Dill., Mun.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Woodruff Chancery Court; Edward D. Robertson, Chancellor; 1. The ordinance was void, and the ratification gave it no validity. Dillon on Mun. Corp., § § 1301, 791-2; Pond on Pub. Utilities, § § 354-5, 348, 361-2; 16 Utah, 440; 160 Ind. 32; 7 S. D. 9; 71 Ark. 4; 86 Id. 1; 94 Id. 380; 109 Id. 90; 90 Id. 380; 93 Id. 490; 86 Id. 1; 71 Id. 4. ■ 2. There is no estoppel. Dill., Mun. Corp., p. 797, § 777; 58 Ark. 271; 93 Id. 490; 83 Id. 276; 82 Id. 531; 126 la. 105; 117 Id. 258; 59 Cal. 517; 87 Wis. 496; 149 Mo. 36; 22 Mich. 104; Bigelow on Est. 754; 20 Wall. 655; 30 L. B. A. 848; 106…

1Opinion of the Court

McCulloch, -C. J.

A light -and water plant was constructed in the town of Augusta by a private corporation under franchise granted :by the city council, and in the year 1909 an improvement district was formed in said town for the purpose of raising funds to purchase said plant -and to maintain -and operate the same. A special act wias pass-ad by the General Assembly of 1909, ratifying the organization and authorizing the purchase of the plant .and proceedings under the improvement district statutes of the State with reference to levying assessments, etc., -and the statute -also gave -authority…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texarkana v. FriedellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. Morrilton Waterworks Improvement District v. EarlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  3. Newport v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  4. Harnwell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Malvern v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Natural Gas & Fuel Corp. v. Norphlet Gas & Water Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Arkansas Light & Power Co. v. ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Commissioners of Broadway-Main Street Bridge District v. Quapaw ClubSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Brown v. Waterworks Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API