Legal Opinion

Washington County v. Stearns

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtby, J.

Washington County sued to enjoin defendant from continuing to remove sand from a pit upon a certain tract of his land. The land was in an area zoned under the Washington County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as “Suburban Besidential.” Defendant alleged in his answer that the zoning ordinance is vague and illegal as it purports to regulate his land, and that it was not validly adopted. His second defense is that the ordinance is arbitrary as it applies to his land and purports to prevent him from lawful use thereof.

The trial court’s findings were that defendant *368“has from on or about the summer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. Calvar CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. BALLARD, MAYOR, ETC. v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bither v. Baker Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Bither v. Baker Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Multnomah County v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. Clackamas County v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. Lane County v. BessettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API