Dentsply International, Inc. v. Kerr Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
I. FACTS
On April 7, 1989, Dentsply International, Inc. and Dentsply Research & Development Corp. (“Dentsply”) filed suit against Sybron Corporation (“Sybron”), seeking relief for alleged trademark and patent infringement by Sybron of some of Dentsply’s dental products. (D.I. 1). The Clerk of the Court assigned the case the designation of 89-167 (“89-167” or “Dentsply action”). Dentsply had intended to sue the licensee of dental products manufactured by Centrix, Inc. (“Centrix”). Soon after the suit was filed, Dentsply discovered that Kerr Manufacturing Company…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Bechtel Corporation and Bechtel Power Corporation v. Local 215, Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Codex Corporation and Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Milgo Electronic Corporation and International Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- William Gluckin & Co., Inc. v. International Playtex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Leonard R. Kahn v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Liberty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Schuessler v. Benchmark Marketing & Consulting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Maloney v. GordonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2004
- Apeldyn Corp. v. Sony Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.