Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Callahan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 6, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

In this petition for a writ of mandamus the petitioners are the seven members of the special unpaid commission (sometimes called the Massachusetts Crime Commission) appointed by the Governor pursuant to Bes. 1962, c. 146. The respondents are the three members of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority appointed by the Governor pursuant to St. 1952, c. 354. The purposes of the petition are to require the respondents to make available certain records and “to cooperate fully with the commission in the conduct of its investigation.” The respondents filed both a demurrer and an answer. G-. L. (Ter.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hiller v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Channel Fish Co. v. Boston Fish Market Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Gardner v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. SILVERMAN'S LIQUOR MART v. Licensing Bd. for BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Walsh v. Wollaston Golf ClubMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Commonwealth v. GilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API