Gardner v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.
In this petition for attachment for contempt the petitioners are the members of the Massachusetts Crime Commission, so called, established pursuant to Ees. 1962, c. 146. The respondents are the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, established by St. 1952, c. 354, as amended, and one Britton and one Schnackenberg, employees of the Authority, summoned as witnesses by the Commission. In a previous proceeding for the enforcement of process by the Commission against the Authority *533and five of its employees, two of whom were Britton and Schnackenherg, onr order concluded: ‘ ‘ The rescript to the county…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Attorney General v. BrissendenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Gardner v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Sheridan v. GardnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Commonwealth v. BenoitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Gardner v. CallahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ward v. PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. GilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Commonwealth v. GilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Commonwealth v. GilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Goslin v. Chief Administrative JusticeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.