Legal Opinion
Bembery v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 14, 2000No. 98-CV-1223, 98-CV-1317PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant (Bembery) was a partner in a venture which leased two townhouses to the District of Columbia from 1985 to the end of 1994. At issue in this appeal are primarily charges under the lease for the District’s overtime use of the buildings from July 1992 through November 1993. The trial court ruled that Bembery’s claim for overtime charges before November 1993 was barred by the statute of limitations. We agree with that determination. We likewise sustain the court’s determination that the District was not hable for penalty interest under the District of Columbia Quick Payment Act for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fowler v. A & A Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Massman Construction Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Keefe Co. v. Americable International, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Management Partnership, Inc. v. CrumlinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Toomey v. CammackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Murray v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- EastBanc, Inc. v. Georgetown Park Associates II, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Medhin v. HailuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Lannan Found. v. GingoldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Long v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.