Legal Opinion

Stansbury v. Stansbury

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1957No. Civ. 5376PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

Plaintiff, Trueman W. Stansbury, hereinafter referred to as “Trueman,” and defendant, Rae Helene Stansbury, hereinafter referred to as “Rae,” were married in New York on February 25, 1945, and at the time of this marriage, plaintiff’s previous marriage with one Jennie H. Stansbury was not dissolved and was in full force and effect. He had secured an interlocutory decree of divorce from her on July 28, 1944, and the final decree terminating this marriage was not entered until August 9, 1945.

Plaintiff and defendant came to California and lived together as man and wife until plaintiff filed his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Schneider v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Estate of ZlaketCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API