Legal Opinion
Estate of Zlaket
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1960No. Civ. 24253PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying the petitioner (appellant) a family allowance from the estate of her deceased husband.
A résumé of the facts is as follows:
Appellant and G. N. Zlaket (hereinafter referred to as Zlaket), now deceased, were married November 6, 1920. Zlaket had been previously married and had two daughters as the issue of such marriage. There were no children as the issue of the marriage of Zlaket and petitioner.
On or about April 24, 1939, petitioner and Zlaket made and entered into an agreement entitled “Property Settlement Agreement” which among other things provided as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Johnston v. . SpicerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Schumacher v. City National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Seavey v. KuhlkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Wells Fargo Bank v. KalalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Estate of KalalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.