In re McKesson Governmental Entities Average Wholesale Price Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL [Docket No. 1]
JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant McKesson Corporation’s Motion to Compel came on for hearing on Friday, October 30, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. For the reasons stated below, the Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.
II. BACKGROUND
A. The Litigation
On May 20, 2008, the San Francisco City Attorney and the San Francisco Health Plan (“SFHP”) filed suit against Defendant McKesson alleging violations of various statutes, including the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. § 1962) and the California False Claims…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Formaldehyde Institute v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Randy Quarles v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Coastal Corp. v. DuncanDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. McAleenanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Athletics Investment Group, LLC v. Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Athletics Investment Group, LLC v. Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Chase Bourque, et al. v. United States of America Department of State, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.