Legal Opinion

Athletics Investment Group, LLC v. Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 28, 2024No. 3:21-cv-05246Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ATHLETICS INVESTMENT GROUP, Case No. 21-cv-05246-MMC (DMR) LLC, 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON OUTSTANDING 9 DISCOVERY DISPUTES RE: v. SUBPOENA TO BAAQMD 10 SCHNITZER STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 166, 169 11 Defendant. 12 13 This is an action brought pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s (“CAA”) citizen suit enforcement 14 provision, 42 U.S.C. § 7604, to challenge Defendant Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.’s 15 (“Schnitzer”) operations at its metal shredding facility in West Oakland (the “facility”). Plaintiff 16 Athletics…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. National Wildlife Federation v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. In re Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on the Office of the Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API