Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Furlong v. Waukesha County Court

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1970No. 264PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

I. Prohibition.

The first issue confronting this court is whether prohibition in the circuit court was the proper method for defendant to test the criminal action against him in the county court.

We have considered this very issue in a number of recent decisions.3 “. . . Prohibition will not lie whenever habeas corpus or other adequate remedy is available.” 4

Defendant seeks to suppress any prosecution based on evidence seized as a result of the search warrant which he contends was illegally issued.

The skeletal framework of defendant’s syllogism is: The search warrant issued by Judge Dancey was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Browne v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. Cullen v. CeciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. FlynnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Jones v. GerhardsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. MarshallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. StarkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bin-Rilla v. IsraelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API