Legal Opinion

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 2005No. A04-1713PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.

Appellant Jose Padilla contests the district court’s grant of declaratory relief with respect to an insurance policy issued by respondents to a company wholly owned by an individual who assaulted appellant. The district court granted respondents’ motion for summary judgment, finding that a policy exclusion applied and no indemnification would be required in an underlying civil suit. We affirm the district court’s judgment.

FACTS

Appellant Jose Padilla worked for a company that shared a common work area with Bloomington Steel, a corporation wholly owned by Cecil…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Continental Western Insurance v. ToalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. BartlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Terrace Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Diocese of Winona v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API