Legal Opinion

People v. Tessman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 2014No. D062372PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, Acting P. J.

Jeanette Sonja Tessman appeals the order granting her five years of formal probation after the trial court conducted a bench trial and found her guilty of one count of residential burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 460, subd. (a))1 and one count of commercial burglary (§ 459). Tessman contends the residential burglary conviction must be reversed because the building she entered was not an inhabited dwelling house at the time of the entry, and the commercial burglary conviction must be reversed because *1296the conviction might have rested on a legally incorrect theory of guilt.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Street v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. People v. DenardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. PeytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Andrew Aron, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  5. California Attorney General Opinion 25-902, California Attorney General Reports2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API